Posted in Politics

Can’t Pay? We’ll Take it Away, Zero Hour Contract Britain and the Post Brexit Race to the Bottom

You really cannot make this shit up; Theresa May’s kind and generous country” ;  a country where voyeur Britain gets to watch reality TV shows like “Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away” and here you have it:

“Agents Stewart McCracken and Elmore Victor head to Liverpool for what they expect to be a routine repossession, but instead face the most challenging eviction of their careers. Behind the front door, they find a critically ill two-year-old child with major heart problems, who is on constant life support and unable to breathe without a ventilator.”

And there they are Stewart and Elmore, with their run of the mill, “well, no need to worry, you have got an hour to get your stuff together” . Still, Steward and Elmore, as they themselves say often enough, are “only doing their job”, and teven having a job is important in the “zero hour land of hope and glory’, where, despite the EU having slated these contracts,  they are still there and post Brexit Britain will at least have something left in the race to the bottom.

Posted in Politics

The “Terrorist” Khalid Masood and three quite stupid Articles

The Guardian maintains that Khalid Masood  “was known as a potential extremist in 2010”  and elsewhere the same newspaper tells us that he “acted entirely alone for reasons that may never be known”. It really is difficult deduce the exact message the mainstream media is trying to get across. Nevertheless, while anything the daily drivel pumps out might be viewed with academic caution, there is at least news value in both stories that is worth a modicum of cognitive processing.

A minimal of chewing the cud is as good as it gets with our shoddy press, but the Guardian articles, nevertheless, offer slightly more than a woeful piece in the Independent under the headline, “Khalid Masood: How popular schoolboy became a mass murder who brought terror to Westminster”. “He was a very good sportsman, his mother was a Christian, he was an all-round nice guy, and the drivel and dross goes on and on and Alice Williams, 59, landlady of the Rose and Crown pub tells us that “he would do The Telegraph crossword and would make intelligent conversation, but he was a bit of a racist.”

Now, the gullible glaikit goons get sort of personally involved and genuinely interested in this refuse. After all, for many, gets real, sort of personal, as they could know, or have known, a real landlady like Alice Williams and, hey, who doesn’t like to play the amateur psychiatrist? Yes, who doesn’t want to kow, how a popular schoolboy could become a “mass murderer”?

What are we talking about here? We are talking about a man who “acted entirely alone for reasons that may never be known” and is responsible for four deaths and a few injuries and the real mass murderers? Well, alright there was Stalin and Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot ….but, do I hear that is history, as is Kissenger, Nixon, etc. and that the newspapers are about “news”? Well, if it is real news and real mass murderers that are to be discussed, look no further than the British government supporting the Saudis in killing poor Yemenites along with its active participation in the killing of innocent men, women, and children all over the Middle East.

There we have it and we might even discover that the butcher Blair “was a very good sportsman”, whose  “mother was a Christian, and that “he was an all-round nice guy, or that the buffoon Boris Johnson “would do The Telegraph crossword and would make intelligent conversation, but he was a bit of a racist.”. But, now I am becoming even more implausible than the mediocre media that is forced upon us every day. After all, is anyone really going to believe that Boris Johnson could complete the Telegraph crossword and hold intelligent conversation?

Posted in Politics

The Attack in London and returning to the Real Issues

Let us make no mistake about it, terrorist attacks do not come out of thin air. There is always an action and a reaction and if British support of Saudi launching its’ own terrorist attacks on Yemen, one of the world’s poorest countries, is not enough to engender a reaction, then there is Bahrain, Israel, and countless other places throughout the globe. It is ongoing, it is continuous, and it didn’t start yesterday. But, then only a half-wit would think it did.

Nevertheless, even if it was not unexpected, yesterday’s attack in London was a tragedy and our immediate sympathies must go to those innocents who were injured and lost their lives. Moreover, before the conspiracy theorists start waving their false flag theories, they were, possibly the victims of a misguided religious nutter who believed that he was exercising some divine being’s will. Although, with it now being contended that Khalid Masood, 52, who was born in Kent and had previously been convicted of violent offences, was the perpetrator, it might even be that the elaborate modifiers are surplus to requirements and  what we have here is a simple nutter.

Still, even if that is not going to suit the establishment’s narrative, anyone else being behind yesterday’s attacks is about as likely as Thatcher having given Galtieri the green light to invade the Falklands. Still, didn’t Maggie milk that one, and with the BBC cancelling all of its normal programmes today, we are privy to the most disgusting pathos and “Durchhalteparolen” coming from the very same people who do indeed support Britain’s criminal actions in the Middle East and elsewhere. There might be no resurrection of the “Better Together” campaign when it comes to another Scottish referendum, but the message is already out there, the narrative is already set, and, with Article 50 and the Brexit also about to be triggered, the flags are already flying.

Certainly,there should be no false flag theories, but we should also not be waving a unin jacks. There was a tragedy yesterday in London, but the way that tragedy is being used and the jingoism that is already following on its’ heels is as old as the hills, and with ‘Blighty’s’ very own “Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda”, the BBC, going into overdrive, it remains important to concentrate on the real stories and the real issues. Back to those in the Scottish parliament on Tuesday, but one wonders if the remnants of empire in Westminster will ever be able to return to them. With the Brexit negotiations and a probable Scottish referendum coming up it will certainly make interesting watching. However, let’s hope that we can connect to the real story.




Posted in Palestine and the Middle East, Politics

Israel, the United States, and the real Writing on the Wall

Peter Münch has been writing on Israel for ‘Die Süddeutsche Zeitung’ for a long time and his most recent article “Menetekel”, which translates as “the writing on the wall”, can only confirm a contention made in this blog exactly seven years ago; his reporting represents “drivel of the sort that requires very little research and certainly no thought.” Or, how else are we to view his account and analysis of Israel’s latest incursion into Syria?

The reader is told that this was a routine mission and Israel has been launching attacks like this for years and, even if it does contravene international law, it is given a veneer of normality when it would in fact be normal if Israel was criminalised for its actions. However, what is not normal for hack writers of Mr Münch’s persuasion is, …. wait for it, ….that Syria has retaliated, which Mr Münch sees as an indication of the following scenario if Assad and his allies win in Syria.

Iranian troops will be on Israel’s border, there will be a constant threat to the Golan Heights, which our hack fails to mention is illegally occupied Syrian territory, and the Hezbollah, battle hardened and armed with Syrian weapons, will be relieved of its commitments elsewhere and better prepared for a war with Israel than it was in 2006.

Not only does it appear doubtful that Mr Münch knows how well-prepared the Hezbollah actually was in 2006, but he seems to be unaware that Israel attacking its neighbours, which he says it has been doing for years, and describes as “routine”is in fact a blatant breach of international law. Indeed, all that his piece would appear to do is support the Zionist state in its belief that it needs to adopt an “iron wall” strategy in order to deal with the Palestinians and with its neighbours from a position of unassailable strength.

However, that should come as no surprise as the strategy has become almost synonymous with Israel’s raison d’être and, even if it should be a justification for putting the Zionist state beyond the pale, it is highly unlikely that Mr Münch and millions of other apologists for Israel are going to make that point. Therefore, what we have here is a classical rogue state, minus the unpredictability,unleashed, and unconstrained.

Of course, the reader has to leave the daily drivel pumped out by the mainstream media to get a more realistic assessment of what Israel is doing and Stephen Lendman hits the nail on the head when he says, “Israel reserves the right to attack Syria preemptively at its discretion for any reason any time – a flagrant international law violation” before referring indirectly to the “iron wall” strategy when he points out “if Syria exercises its right of self-defense in response to an Israeli attack on its territory, the IDF will unleash greater aggression than before.”

Mr Lendman the Journalist and Mr Münch the pseudo Journalist seem to agree on what Israel is doing. However, it is only the former who questions the legality of Israel’s actions before going on to criticise the world community when pointing out that it “is silent in the face of Israel’s announced intention to violate international laws governing warfare, besides numerous previous breaches against Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and Iraq, along with subversion against Iran and other nations.”

Furthermore, Mr Lendman succinctly argues that “Israel’s only threats are ones it invents” to effectively continue its ethnic cleansing of Palestine and to continue its support of Washington’s foreign policy. Indeed with the US sending an additional 400 troops to Syria and with the American military having “declined to say how many troops it has deployed”, the evidence would appear to suggest that an original neocon/Israeli/Saudi plan for “regime change” in Syria is still very much on the agenda. Hardly unexpected, but at least proof that Trump’s promised move away from the policy of “intervention and chaos” was nothing more than hot air, but that is another story, even if it represents that bigger picture which totally eludes hacks like Peter Münch.

Posted in Politics

‘Al Jazerra’ Report on Hungary’s Treatment of Refugees and the Pot calls the Kettle Black

It is, of course, right and desirable that the Hungarian government imprisoning refugees is highlighted. Therefore, whether the details of this come to our attention by way of the jingoistic ‘Daily Telegraph’, which the link in the above sentence leads to, or via ‘Al Jazerra’ shouldn’t really matter. No need to shoot the messenger and no reason for us to be anything other than concerned and appalled when we read that “men, women and children are being held in detention centres with little access to medical and mental care.”

Yes, awareness of Hungary’s treatment of refugees and the Central European country’s descent into authoritarianism should be of concern to all of us. As should similar developments in Poland where Jarolaw Kaczynki’s Law and Justice Party (PiS) hold power. Nevertheless, while it might be counterproductive look too closely at the messenger when addressing the issues that are being discussed, a smirk and a shake of the head  are sometimes inevitable.

‘Al Jazerra’ is owned by the Qatari government, which is run by the Al Thani family. In other words, Qatar is a hereditary constitutional monarchy ruled by a family which controls the country’s massive oil and gas reserves. Now, not only does Qatar not accept refugees, but it has “also become a focus of international criticism of the mistreatment of low-paid migrant workers” and those workers still need to get their employer’s permission to change jobs or leave the country.

In other words, it could be as difficult to leave an abusive situation in Qatar as it is to get out of a Hungarian prison. Indeed, foreign journalists who attempt to report on migrant workers’ living and working conditions are detained regularly. Yes, with ‘Al Jazerra’ it really is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Nothing new, of course, and with the Western media singing the praises of our freedoms while our governments kill innocent men, women, and children throughout the globe, with Russia’s ‘RT’ often hitting the nail on the head when discussing the injustices in the West, and perpetrated by the West, but ignoring the crimes committed by the Kremlin both domestically and abroad, it doesn’t mean that we should ignore the news.

Moreover, not only should we not ignore the news wherever it comes from, it is also time we took Viktor Orban and Jarolaw Kaczynki to task in an effort to prevent that magnitude of hypocrisy and base behaviour which characterises, among others, the Gulf States, the oxymoronic “Jewish Democracy”, Washington, Moscow, and BBC Blighty.


Posted in Politics

Theresa May will block Scottish Referendum and it is good News for the Independence Movement

With the news that “Theresa May has moved to block a new Scottish independence referendum”, the predictions on what will happen, if the Scottish government announce that it intends to hold a second referendum made in my last post, which it has now done, are already taking shape and, as implied in that post, the British Prime Minister’s announcement might even represent a best case scenario for the SNP at the present point.

Next week Nicola Sturgeon will seek the approval of the Scottish Parliament to open discussions with the UK government on the details of a Section 30 order, which will facilitate the holding of a second referendum by transferring the necessary power from London to the Scottish Parliament, and the Scottish Parliament will give her that approval. That transfer of power will allow the Scottish government to set the conditions for the next referendum.

That Theresa May would want to deter that happening before the Brexit negotiations have been completed was always certain and we might be sure that Nicola Sturgeon was aware of this. Therefore, while an element of academic caution might be advisable, it is easy to conclude that an excellent piece of political brinkmanship by Sturgeon has handed her government the moral high ground at this early stage and with that a number of voters who might have voted “No” at the last referendum, but who are becoming increasingly disillusioned with the high-handed attitude we see on a daily basis from May and her cronies.

With the upcoming vote in the Scottish Parliament, and with the British government unlikely to react to that vote, the campaign for independence will enter the next stage. However, that should be accompanies by a number of strategies going forward.

Firstly, with the unionist rag, ‘The Scotsman’ announcing that an online petition calling for a second independence referendum bid to be dropped has reached over 145,000 signatures”, it could be time for the Scottish government to start its’ own online petition and that might be accompanied by pro-independence demonstrations throughout the country. This is important because,  even if the country is probably split 50/50 at the moment, the pro-independence movement is more steadfast and, especially with the pig-headed arrogance coming out of London, it is more likely that many of the softer unionists will change camp.

Secondly, the Scottish government’s political brinkmanship last week has already had a desired result for the independence movement. However, calling a referendum, even if the British government refused to recognize it, might be an even more poignant example of political one-upmanship. With the British mainstream media using everything at its disposal to undermine it and with the government in Westminster refusing to recognise the result, there could very well be a reaction in Scotland that would see independence as inevitable and all the more so if the Scottish government can approach the OSCE and get them to observe the referendum.

Finally, while it is an extremely risky strategy, the Scottish government could declare unilateral independence from parliament if the Westminster government continues to block a referendum. Of course, as stated, that could be a dangerous venture . However, it should at least be remembered that what creates a recognised state, is not a referendum, but rather it is that state being recognised in the United Nations.

An independent Scotland is as inevitable, as an independent Ireland was in 1916. Then the British government turned the rebels, from being dangerous lunatics, into martyrs by executing them.Moreover, while martyrdom is what it took in the empire’s heyday, in today’s Scotland it is sufficient to show that, even if the remnants of that disgusting empire is no longer allowed to practice the same type of cruelty on home soil, the arrogance of the British authorities’ towards the Scottish people is as crystal clear as it was towards the Irish people then. It is that arrogance which the SNP and the independence movement will continue to provoke over the next few months.


Posted in Politics

A British Nationalist condemns Scottish Nationalism

The Brexit, Trump, and, yes, even the unforeseen 45%, or so, that the “YES” campaign got in the last referendum, were all sort of unexpected, and that is why an element of caution should be advised when it comes to listening to what the possible outcome of a second independence referendum might be. Still, a couple of conversations in Glasgow last week informed me that another referendum at this point in time might not have the desirable outcome for the SNP and the independence movement.

And there you have her, Theresa May, the sorry strategist, thinking the same thoughts. But, the drivel, the verbal diarrhea, prattle, prattle, hyperbole, hypocrisy, and puerile pathos?  Instead of being obsessed with , “a tunnel vision nationalism”, the Scottish government should be more concerned about “public services like the NHS and education,” she gibbers, and there was me drifting back to one of the two conversations that I had in Glasgow last week.

“Yes, the NHS in Scotland might offer a better service than it does in England, but waiting three hours for a doctor is not much of an improvement on waiting four hours.” There you have it and the SNP, instead of looking for independence, should be making sure that Scots have a health service and public services that are not just a bit, but much much, better than the services that are being provided elsewhere in the UK.

And the “tunnel vision nationalism”? Might that be waking up and walking away from the nightmare that is misplaced myopic megalomaniac Brexit Blighty! Of course, the Scottish people will miss out on all of these super trade deals that are going to happen. “Super trade deals” my arse! Unless, of course, what is meant is selling arms to countries like Saudi Arabia, which is bombing civilians in Yemen and that type of rentier capitalism which sucks money from all over the planet into the pockets of the 1%. Or, in other words, makes lots and lots of money for Theresa and her criminal clique.

Apart from the “prattle, prattle, hyperbole, hypocrisy, and puerile pathos” there is nothing holding the United Kingdom together and it really is time for Scotland to break free. Nevertheless, with “prattle, prattle, hyperbole, hypocrisy, and puerile pathos” still bedazzling and beguiling many north of the Tweed, it might be advisable for the Scottish government to play this one out a bit. Of course, Edinburgh could ask the UK government to grant a Section 30 order, which makes the referendum legally binding, and just hope that Westminster rejects the request until the Brexit negotiations are over.