Fighting for the Zionists as a part of the great game

In 2008 the NSA released a CIA document showing that the organisation knew, at least by 1974, that Israel already had a stockpile of nuclear weapons. This would certainly be in keeping with the contention that the Zionist state had started to produce four to twelve nuclear weapons a year after 1968, which, interestingly, was a decision that can be at least partly traced to the then Minister of Defence, Moshe Dayan’s, belief, that Israel could not depend on the U.S. to defend it. Not only do we have an oxymoronic “Jewish Democracy” but we also have an oxymornic “public secret” of a Zionist state that now has up to 400 nuclear warheads.

However, despite Israel’s nuclear arsenal, not much has in fact changed and while the Zionists are very good at starting wars and pummelling those who are unable to defend themselves and while they might even be able to defend themselves from an outside attack, they are not capable of pursuing their own wars of aggression without outside help and most certainly not to an, in their eyes, successful conclusion. We should listen to Karim Sadjadpour, an associate at the ‘Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’,  when he says “Israel can commence a war with Iran, but it may well take US involvement to conclude it”.  Why should we listen?

Well, with an Israeli attack looking increasingly likely and, with Tehran moving many of its nuclear installations underground, it looking likely before the summer, we have a scenario whereby a “secret” nuclear power, Israel, will try to halt another country, Iran, from possibly becoming a nuclear power. Quite absurd, of course, but it becomes all the more absurd when we are left to understand that it will be left to the U.S. and, by implication, the West, to achieve Israel’s war aims. Not only are we expected to accept the crimes of the Zionist state and that state’s own “secret” nuclear arsenal, but we are also expected to function as its proxy when it comes to its criminal wars or at least to suffer because of those wars.

Of course, it is not quite as simple as that; firstly, the states that make up the Gulf Cooperation Council also would, and increasingly so, like to see this war, providing, of course, that victory is guaranteed, and it can be argued that access to Iran’s oil fields is in itself enough of an incentive for the United States.

However, oil cannot be overtly stated as a reason and without the Zionist state there will be no credible pretex. After all, after Israel attacks Iran, it is so much easier to suggest that Israel’s existence had been threatened and that they had to defend themselves and that we are now going to have to defend them. Or is it actually possible to envisage a situation where the hypocrites actually tell us that we are going to war for oil and, in collusion with a handful of Sunni despots to, secure Zionist and Western hegemony throughout the region?


About sanculottist

There are a lot of poor bastards out there being used and abused; it is just not cricket "old bean". Something tells me that ignorance is not bliss, but is, in fact, simply ignorance and in the global village we cannot look the other way.
This entry was posted in Palestine and the Middle East, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Fighting for the Zionists as a part of the great game

  1. Or perhaps ‘The West’, led by the US, will privately egg Isreal on enough for them and Iran to bomb each other back to the stone age, making a wholesale bloody mess of the region before going in to clean up…
    Or perhaps I’m just too cynical for my own good?

  2. sanculottist says:

    well, that would at least contradict oscar wilde’s,”a cynic is a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing,” the price, if israel attacks iran, is going to be incalculable
    but hey …. chill out and we can always look on the bright side …. always … and, not being a disciple of hisorical inevitability, it hasn’t happened yet!

  3. I do agree and, of course, I am playing devilsaardvark to a certain extent, but the question still needs to be asked…
    Has the world already paid an ‘incalculable’ price for an unstable Middle East? And has it become a boil that needs to be lanced, however painful that process may be? Yes, I know that’s two questions.
    The US certainly haven’t got the stomach to don a pair of rubber gloves and prick Israel, but I think we all know how much they’d like to bend Iran over!
    And like yourself, I am not a disciple of historical inevitability…
    …but whilst I shall not be counting any poultry whilst the world continues its game of nuclear chicken, I will endeavour to chill. With a cold one!
    Once again, great post and keep up the good work.

  4. sanculottist says:

    the “chill out” was inadvertently” directled at me, although i was thinking it is something we should all do from time to time.
    nevertheless, there is some serious crap about to hit our faces and not just because of the dungheap that zionism has created and the shit hole that the West’s own, “moderate” sycophantic sunni sultans of swing are digging.
    yes, it is all about the oil and the geopolitical end game is pretty serious stuff.
    perhaps, if the hypocrisy and the telling “fibs” were to stop, we might all get the chance to sti down and discuss a way out of this mess. however, that, of course, is not going to happen and, if it is not going to happen, ……

  5. …one of us ought to start writing the screenplay! Anyone got Danny Boyle’s phone number?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s